This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentine politics. If you would like to participate, you can improve
Federal Party (Argentina, 1973), or
sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our
to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles
If it is about the former, then at a minimum the article needs a rename to
Federal Party (1973) in order to avoid blocking the use of "Federal Party (Argentina)" as the article title for the traditional "Federal Party" of Argentina from the 19th century, currently misnamed Federales. Clearly, the
primary name of "Federal Party" belongs to the 19th century party which was at the center of Argentine history (along with the Unitarians) for decades, shaping the history of the country, and not the minor 20th century party of the same name. If it is about the latter, it's odd that English Wikipedia would have an article about an Argentine minor political party that even Spanish Wikipedia does not, and it should probably become a redirect to the article about López Murphy.
Mathglot (
talk)
18:08, 14 June 2018 (UTC)reply
It looks like this article came about as part of a project of mass creation of one-sentence stubs about political parties around the world by Wilfried Derksen (
talk ·
contribs) who has created many thousands of these, mostly programmatically, I suspect. (The article was later linked in
this 2006 edit to the History section of the
Recreate for Growth article by Mtiedemann (
talk ·
contribs), without the identity of the party in question actually being clear, as there are no references in that section.) Looking at the contributions by Wilfried Derksen on April 4, I see that he created 16 political party articles of about 250 bytes each in the four-minute period between 21:26 and 21:29 on April 4, 2005, including this one. It's likely the author saw it in a list somewhere, and created the article without knowing what the party was about, or doing any research to identify it.
Given that history, and the lack of any clearly identifiable topic for the article, I think we can reuse the article and rename it any way we choose. It seems clear to me, that the 1973 party is clearly the second most important party by this name, and the article should be retitled to reflect that, and the content altered accordingly. (The most important one is the 19th century party, which already has its own article.) That means that current links to this article that refer to anything other than the 1973 party (such as the link at
Recreate for Growth) no longer point to the right place, and will need to be delinked.
The last issue to decide, is what to rename it. Current candidates are:
As always, per
WP:COMMONNAME, the decision comes down to what name is used by the majority of reliable, independent, English-language sources, and I'll be looking into that.
Mathglot (
talk)
19:28, 14 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Since both English expressions occur with
some frequency in English, there's no reason to consider the foreign language expression. Looking at Google books results seems to show "Federal party" about 2 1/2 times over "Federalist party". Since "Federal Party (Argentina)" is ambiguous, and "Federal Party (Argentina 1973)" is unnecessary per
WP:PRECISION, the article should be renamed "Federal Party (1973)".
Mathglot (
talk)
02:07, 15 June 2018 (UTC)reply