This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
plants and
botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
food and
drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review
WP:Trivia and
WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects,
select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
There is no dispute about what farro is among food anthropologists. It is triticum dicoccum and is also known as emmer. ("Wheat evolution: integrating archaeological and biological evidence", Mark Nesbitt, Institute of Archaeology)
Spelt is known as triticum spelta.
Perhaps this should also point to Emmer?
It's not so much a dispute as to whether emmer de farro is a distinct entity, so much as to whether the dish
farro is sufficiently distinct from
emmer as to warrant a new article. After all, there are many rice dishes from many varieties of rice, but the cultural/regional/historical aspect of various dishes is significant enough to rate them an individual article instead of simply mention under
Rice.
MatthewVanitas (
talk)
00:25, 12 November 2009 (UTC) (please don't forget to sign comments with ~~~~reply
Actually, the official distinction between the three kinds is:
farro piccolo or farro monococco (Triticum monococcum)
The "Sizing" section refers to Emmer as "Farro medio" and Spelt as "Farro grande", but this contradicts what's in the definition section. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
59.167.254.28 (
talk)
01:51, 30 June 2014 (UTC)reply
just what does farro look like if one buys it, rather than grows it?
This article describes the grains from which farro comes, in great detail, Latin names and all, with photos of the grains at harvest time. But people do not eat the whole stalk. What does it look like: small rounds, or long grains like rice? How has the grain been prepared before someone buys it, to use it in a recipe? Is it considered a whole grain food product? Maybe this article I found will help.
http://www.npr.org/2013/10/02/227838385/farro-an-ancient-if-complicated-grain-worth-figuring-out
I never heard the word until a few days ago, as the name of a soup in an Italian restaurant. The waiter used barley as an English indication of the soup. From this article I glean only that the tasty, light colored, soft ingredient in the otherwise reddish soup was the farro. And it was of the wheat family. Excellent soup, I will add. I hope someone can add to this article, that very basic description of what it is, before jumping into arguments of fine points as to other names, other grains, also given the name. Photos of the three types of farrro each in a bowl? Or words that describe them? A picture of a bag or box of it as it would be purchased in a shop? Thanks. --
Prairieplant (
talk)
04:47, 17 July 2014 (UTC)reply
Do any of these three kinds of wheat have gluten in them? Many of our readers are allergic to gluten. It be useful knowledge to say either way. —
Lentower (
talk)
15:39, 7 February 2018 (UTC)reply
I'm finding it difficult to find the answer to this in the article.
The lede states, "Farro is a food composed of the grains of certain wheat species...", which to me implies that "farro" is the name of a food composed of a combination of several wheat species.
But later under "Definition" it seems to be suggested that "farro" is a name used for any ONE of several singular grains.
Which is it? I think the article needs a clearer statement of this, probalby in the lede, but I don't know the answer, so I can't edit it in. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
74.95.43.253 (
talk)
19:51, 18 June 2020 (UTC)reply