![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
...ref>Reisinger, Don (Nov 5, 2015). "Faraday Future is the Tesla Competitor That Doesn't Want to Be Tesla". Fortune. Retrieved Nov 10, 2015.</ref...
Retrieved in Austria, via Safari 7.0.6 / Mac OS X 10.9.5 title of article is again (I made a correcting edit today at 7:46): Faraday Future A Mysterious Electric Carmaker has its Sights on Tesla. / edited 5.11.2015, 3:21 PM EST /
but browser window headline (similar to url) is: Faraday Future is the Tesla Competitor That Doesn't Want to Be Tesla.
--
1. Does the article of Fortune show up in the USA with a different title?
2. Did you user:Tdrewes and user:Stepho-wrs take the the window headline? manually or somehow automated? -- Helium4 ( talk) 19:27, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Can we cite a news article for this judgement? I can be wrong, but are social media pages reliable to preserve their content? Which social media pages were hit? Facebook, Google+, Twitter?:
"Following the reveal, their social media pages were hit with mostly negative comments. Many stated that they were expecting details on an affordable production car that would compete with the Tesla Model 3 or Nissan Leaf. They expressed disappointment that the only design shown was of a high end concept race-car for the rich, instead of an affordable production car for the every day driver."
194.31.198.71 ( talk) 12:04, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
With respect to the question posed in this reversion: The purpose of the quote is to support the text. Most of our editors and readers cannot access the text of the article because it is behind a paywall. User:Fred Bauder Talk 05:56, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
This back and forth edit warring is getting on my nerves. As far as I can tell, the principle parties agree that:
Both Quesin ( talk · contribs) and Roger610863 ( talk · contribs) have agreed to these facts in their edit and/or edit summaries and the references back it up. It seems that the difference comes from whether the Chinese backing should be in the lead sentence. To my mind, it makes little difference either way. It's fine to say it early on. It is also mentioned in the last sentence of the lead paragraph, so that's fine too. Stepho talk 09:18, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 10:51, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 13:51, 30 November 2022 (UTC)