The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the music video for "Fantastic Baby" by
Big Bang is the first by a
K-pop boy band to reach 100 million, 200 million, and 300 million views on
YouTube?
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of
hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and contribute to the
discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
I have just modified 2 external links on
Fantastic Baby. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
I have just modified 2 external links on
Fantastic Baby. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
"was released on March 28, 2012 simultaneously with the group's fourth Japanese studio album with" → "was released on March 28, 2012, as part of Big Bang's fourth Japanese studio album of"
"Musically, the song has been described as an" → "The song is an"
Hip hop should not have a dash in it and mention
hip house as a genre here too
The part about the concept is not properly sourced in the body
Swap the first and second sentences of the second para for the correct order
"It was well received by" → "The song was well received by"
Merge the third para with the above one, plus swap commercial performance and music video in the order
Merge Not done, I generally find commercial performance and reception/music video info in their own paragraphs in the lead more organized
Nkon21 I guess you can keep these paras separate since the size isn't too small, but I still recommend to change the order of the content accordingly. --
K. Peake07:06, 17 February 2021 (UTC)reply
"is described as" → "was described as" on the audio sample text
No sources mention the concept being bold; there is one mentioning "anarchistic", as I will identify later here. Also, add the hip house genre to the audio sample text.
Are you sure there isn't any background info to add about the song, e.g.
the change in sound or similar stuff?
Remove "full-on banger" because that is an opinion of how good the song is so provides undue weight in this section
The aforementioned Billboard ref also says about the digital thumps and synth wails of the song, which can be wrote about in a sentence after the genres
Both of the catchphrases should be mentioned per the
five year anniversary ref, but keep the NME description in the same sentence while specifying which catchphrase it is focusing on
No fashion show performance is mentioned here; either find the appropriate source(s) to write about the performance or remove the img, as the sample and the img in music video section can be enough illustrations for this article
"The single received critical acclaim upon release." → "The song was met with acclaim from
music critics." with the target, especially since a lot of the reviews are post-release
"it as the first song" → "the track as "the first song"
"with its then-groundbreaking" → "with it's [sic] then-groundbreaking"
The ability to take "K-Pop to a whole new level" is not sourced, plus no info from [7] is currently written out here; maybe note how he says about the song having a "dynamic sound" and "swaggering" from the ref?
You should give a brief overview of the most notable awards won by the song at the start of the section, plus write out the music program wins in prose since that is only two, which is not enough to warrant a table
Remove the video awards from here, especially as they are in the later section anyway
Not done I think that the table should list all the awards that the song (and MV) has received
Nkon21 Your addition of prose here is very good, but I object to the music video awards being listed here since they are not for the song itself, plus it is repetitive with them being included later on too. --
K. Peake07:06, 17 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Remove the "one of only two..." part since it is unsourced
"the song was certified platinum," → "the song was certified platinum by the RIAJ in the country,"
You have not mentioned the peak position on Japan Hot 100
"was certified 2x Platinum by the Recording Industry Association of Japan (RIAJ)" → "was certified double platinum by the RIAJ in Japan"
Add a citation for double platinum
Not done I don't why but I can't access the 2x platinum ref in the certifications template for some reason, I'm not sure if its just me, but even when I Command+F the ref content it won't show up.
Nkon21 I have added a refname to the table now for you and invoke it here, then you should be fine... also you haven't mentioned the first RIAJ certification was in the country. --
K. Peake20:58, 17 February 2021 (UTC)reply
"and captured the fight" → "and captures the fight"
"jewelled crowns, wearing dark make-up" → "jewelled crowns, among other accessories, while they have dark make-up on." since the hairstyles are unsourced
"focused on the group's" → "focused on the band's"
"and ultimately disband the group," → "and ultimately disband Big Bang,"
"Big Bang's fans, who continued to defend and protect Big Bang" → "the band's fans, who continued to defend and protect them"
Nkon21 That is fine, just remove the wikilinks on Psy and boy band, respectively, plus I will look through this article in full tomorrow now everything has been marked as done; it's late GBT. --
K. Peake21:43, 17 February 2021 (UTC)reply
On hold until all of the issues are fixed; this article may not meet most of the GA criteria, but it is not massively far off so a fail is not happening on my watch! --
K. Peake14:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Nkon21 You still need to fix the order for music video info in the lead, especially since it is currently not all together anyway. Also, mention the country for the first Japanese citation because it is not included even once in that sentence and add the double platinum certification per refname, plus in references you forgot to change Mashable to publisher. --
K. Peake07:10, 18 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Kyle Peake, *Accidentally edited logged out* Ok, I have reordered the lead to have the commercial performance first followed by the MV info. Also, I added the mention of the country and renamed the ref to "double platinum", as the previous name might come off as insensitive to some, and changed the parameter of Mashable to publisher. ɴᴋᴏɴ21❯❯❯talk20:12, 18 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Nkon21 You accidentally misplaced critical reception in the process, but I have altered this for you. ✓Pass now, good job on implementing the other edits properly! --
K. Peake20:52, 18 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Did you know nomination
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Then to my understanding there is no need for QPQ yet. The wording is quite convoluted. I suggest something like ... was the first music video by a
K-pop boy band to reach 100 million, 200 million, and 300 million views on
YouTube? What do you think?
HĐ (
talk)
16:09, 24 February 2021 (UTC)reply