This Review is on hold until the possible issues found on
Earwig's Copyvio Detector are discussed etc. There is a 75% score with afi.com/members/catalog/DetailView.aspxs=&Movie=56407 the AFI article and a 90% score with alanparker.com/film/fame/making. Usually in these cases it is a matter of the other source mirroring WP or of an abundance of quotes appearing within the WP article. I am casting no aspersions here, just that this needs to be discussed on this Review page before I can proceed. Thanks,
Shearonink (
talk)
17:15, 4 February 2017 (UTC)reply
I am going to do some more proofreading-readthroughs to catch any possible issues I might have missed. Pending any new problems, I should be able to finish up this Review within the next few days.
Shearonink (
talk)
21:41, 10 February 2017 (UTC)reply
The timeline of the original movie and its subsequent projects is nicely laid-out and easy to understand. Going forward the only change I would think about would be to go through and adjust possible puffery words - for instance that Cara was propelled to "musical stardom" by the film, etc.
Shearonink (
talk)
22:11, 12 February 2017 (UTC)reply