This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the
BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the
project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the
BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Surrey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Surrey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SurreyWikipedia:WikiProject SurreyTemplate:WikiProject SurreySurrey-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
I don't think it's notable. A couple of times they refer to an experience, clearly sexual, they had in Kidderminster, but the place itself is not relevant. The point is surely that their steamy experiences can be so easily narrowed down. That is of passing interest as belonging to the stereotype but it's not really important.
Thehalfone (
talk)
22:53, 7 August 2009 (UTC)reply
I added a 'Citation needed' tag for Ronnie Stevens's guest appearance in the series, which was removed almost immediately. It turns out, of course, that he did appear in one of the episodes (i.e. my thorough research wasn't as thorough as it should have been!), but is this not one of those situations where a citation would actually be a good thing to add? It would help to prevent someone else making the same mistake I did. Is IMDB considered a sufficiently reputable source for a citation? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
92.239.123.184 (
talk)
17:59, 15 March 2014 (UTC)reply
The IMDb is considered to be a perfectly valid source by me. But some Wikipedians don't like that the IMDb won't accept Wikipedia as a citation so they petulantly refuse to accept anything from the IMDb. Would it be enough just to specify the episode details where Ronnie Stevens appears and is credited? It was "Vicars and Tarts" (1984), Season 1, Episode 5 --
SteveCrook (
talk)
05:01, 16 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Yes, I think so, although it might be as well to add similar details for other guests, such as the ones you listed and of course James Grout, who appeared in the episode where Martin joined a gentleman's club. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
92.239.123.184 (
talk)
14:43, 17 March 2014 (UTC)reply
I have just modified one external link on
Ever Decreasing Circles. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
The text of the article used to say that the programme was based in 'Mole Valley, East Surrey', with 'Mole Valley' being a link to the local government area of that name and 'East Surrey' being a link to the Westminster constituency of that name. These two areas are actually completely separate with 'Mole Valley' being some distance to the west of 'East Surrey'. The Mole Valley area would probably be better described as being in central Surrey. I've therefore altered the article to say 'Mole Valley, Surrey', with only Mole Valley being a link to the relevant area.
Axad12 (
talk)
15:54, 3 May 2023 (UTC)reply