From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history ) ·
Article talk (
|
history ) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Jaguar (
talk ·
contribs )
13:08, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
reply
I'll have this to you soon.
JAG
UAR
13:08, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
reply
GA review – see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
Is it reasonably well written ?
A. Prose is "
clear and
concise ", without
copyvios , or spelling and grammar errors:
B.
MoS compliance for
lead ,
layout ,
words to watch ,
fiction , and
list corporation :
Is it factually accurate and
verifiable ?
A. Has an
appropriate reference section :
B. Citation to reliable sources
where necessary :
C.
No original research :
Is it broad in its coverage ?
A.
Major aspects :
B.
Focused :
Is it
neutral ?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable ?
No
edit wars , etc:
Does it contain
images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status , and
valid fair use rationales are provided for
non-free content :
B. Images are provided if possible and are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions :
Overall :
Pass or Fail:
I've just read through the article and can hardly believe I'm doing this, but I'm giving this an instant pass . If anyone is frowning on this please bear in mind that in my 380 reviews, I've only done this twice. This article is well written, comprehensive and I couldn't find anything wrong with it. Well done!
JAG
UAR
22:07, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
reply
Whoa, that's awesome. Thank you!--
IDV
talk
22:14, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
reply