Alright, I did a pretty thorough peer review here
[1] with the FAC criteria in mind, so I'll see what has been changed since then, so I don't anticipate much more has to be done.
FunkMonk (
talk)
19:04, 1 May 2024 (UTC)reply
"Enhydriodon is known well by its advanced dentition" Well-known for? Not sure what the current sentence means. And well-known seems a bit strong, I doubt it's well-known for much more than specialists. Or "its advanced dentition is well-known"?
"Erections and statuses of African species" While I know what it means, "erections" does sound a little funny. Why not simply "naming"? I think "status" singular would work better too.
Since these are mainly known for their teeth, it would make more sense, and be more attractive as the first image the viewer sees, to use the image of the dentition there.
Also best that
life restoration or similar is linked in the caption, so that the reader is redirected to
paleoart, as this has caused confusion in the past. There is a chance that some reviewers will ask that "hypothetical" is added in front of the caption.
All valid species should be redirected, though, as this is the article where they're covered, in case someone searched for them. Some may even search for the synonyms if they are reading older literature, has certainly helped me a lot when researching old taxa.