![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Encoding page were merged into Code and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Since text encoding is now a redirect to character encoding , should we delete the line in the article about text encoding? (since we already have a line about character encoding). Or does it need to point to something like formatted text or markup language ? -- DavidCary 3 July 2005 13:41 (UTC)
"Encoding is the process of transforming information from one format into another. The opposite operation is called decoding." I think this is very unspecific, I would rather write: "Encoding is the process of transforming information from one format (A) into another (B). The opposite operation, the transformation from format B to format A is called decoding." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.51.122.93 ( talk) 06:48, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
I would like to know the difference between encoding and coding, in the field of electronics.
The encoding page gives this explanation:
In communications systems, the altering of the characteristics of a signal to make the signal more suitable for an intended application, such as optimizing the signal for transmission
The coding page (this page) gives this explanation:
Electronic encoding transforms a signal into a form optimized for transmission or storage
It looks pretty the same... -- Bernard François 09:41, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
I noticed a page about Entropy encoding, but that page is suggested to be merged into Source coding. If it's relevant to this page, someone who knows more about it could add it here.-- Bernard François 09:47, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
I often read out mobile numbers over the phone and wonder if it'd be quicker to call out double digit numbers instead of single digit numbers. Maybe a mix is best? For a number like 0871020304, I'd normally say "oh, eight, seven,(pause),one,oh,two,(pause), oh, three, (pause), oh, four. I could go with "oh, eight, seven,(pause), ten, twenty, thirty, four." This would be a better encoding but it might not be as easily understood by the person on the other end of the phone. -- Shtanto 09:41, 12 January 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.100.38.132 ( talk)