This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Palaeontology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Plants Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

I am not quite sure this Bot thinks it found. The quoted site uses a different classification to the one I adopted here. I wrote the text without reference to this site, and is based on the classification and data in Anderson et al. (2007) 'Brief hisytory of the gymnosperms' to which I must confess to being a coauthor! I will remove the tag. CCleal ( talk) 17:51, 21 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Noted, must have been a false positive. Thanks, Acather96 ( talk) 16:04, 23 December 2010 (UTC) reply