Emotions in virtual communication was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the
good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
I'll be glad to review this one. I'll start with a close readthrough of the article, noting initial issues, and then move to the criteria checklist when those have been addressed. --
Khazar2 (
talk)
15:13, 5 January 2013 (UTC)reply
Initial readthrough
One initial issue that I notice is that the lead does not seem to provide an adequate summary of the article contents (see
WP:LEAD); you should also include the information "CMC may lack many of the auditory and visual cues normally associated with the emotional aspects of interactions." into the body as well as the lead.
"While text-based communication eliminates audio and visual cues" -- this doesn't seem quite right; after all, text is still visual, and may include images, etc. I realize you mean something like "normal physical cues" or the like, but this should be rephrased.
I'll pause here to make sure this review is "live", and we can continue when you've addressed the above issues. Thanks it advance for your work on this one! --
Khazar2 (
talk)
15:13, 5 January 2013 (UTC)reply
Since it's been a week without these points being addressed, I'm closing this review for inactivity, and recommending not listing this article at this time. If anyone would like to address some or all of the above, however, and renominate, please go for it! Cheers, --
Khazar2 (
talk)
12:24, 12 January 2013 (UTC)reply
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 12 August 2020 and 4 December 2020. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Epainter20.
Hi everyone, this site is dated and I wanted to update the expressions portion to include more recent research and specifically discuss emojis and AI.
Havana.xeros (
talk)
22:17, 14 November 2023 (UTC)reply
I finished updating the expressions section of this page, if anyone has ideas of more information I can add regarding emojis and AI in virtual communication let me know. Other than that I think the page is much more relevant to the current interpretation of emotions in virtual communication. :)
Havana.xeros (
talk)
18:07, 16 November 2023 (UTC)reply