Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the
good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a
good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the
good article instructions.)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the
style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
IMDb is not a good metric, even if repeated in other sources, as it's user-generated and subject to all sorts of issues like
selection bias and
vote stacking.
Without repeating other articles too much, I think there is some place in "Production" for an explanation of "six seasons and a movie" and that this did become the final episode after Yahoo! Screen collapsed.
This might be some use.
Some book sources that look useful:
[1][2]. I would like to use
TV (The Book) but Google Books won't show me a preview:
[3]
Per
WP:VGRS, CBR is a "situational" source, so we need to think about whether this is an appropriate use.
Let me know any thoughts you have. I can try to incorporate some of these sources within the next few weeks, but if you can do it sooner then go for it. —
Bilorv (talk)
17:26, 3 March 2024 (UTC)reply
So included on the season six DVD it includes an extra titled "Six seasons and a finale" which includes some production details. Could it be cited or would it be considered Original research the same way citing an episode would be? Questions?fourOlifanofmrtennant (she/her)20:14, 7 March 2024 (UTC)reply
@
OlifanofmrTennant: other than some of the additional sources above I think we've resolved all those points. I want to add any more sources I can find and reformulate the "Reception" section
by theme rather than by critic. I've put a lot of the content in an "Analysis" section—do you think it makes sense at the moment? Does any of the content need to be reordered or move back to "Production"?Also, I like the fact about the opening shots from the DVD commentary. I know some of them aren't filled with much information but are there any other facts that could be relevant? (We shot this scene on location—okay, he's right. It won't work.) —
Bilorv (talk)
17:28, 12 April 2024 (UTC)reply
@
OlifanofmrTennant: I've not forgotten this article but I have been very busy. I can't commit to doing this immediately but in the next month I could carry out some more edits and then we could co-nominate it for GA. If you would prefer not to wait and nominate it yourself then go ahead—I don't mind either way. —
Bilorv (talk)
21:22, 2 May 2024 (UTC)reply
@
OlifanofmrTennant: I'm very sorry I wasn't able to get this done but I was snowed under by some unexpected commitments. I hope you can still move forwards with it and get the green plus of approval. —
Bilorv (talk)
18:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC)reply