This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance). An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

I do not see how NASA ADS could be judged non-reliable, etc. Wikipedia is full of pages of scientists in the same field of Elizalde having bibliometrics far worse than him. Thank you. 45 Wuz ( talk) 08:27, 15 September 2013 (UTC) reply

• Which is why the article did not get a "notability" tag. However, WP is an encyclopedia and statements need to be verifiable by references to independent "reliable sources". I know that WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS. The correct response to that problem is to clean up those articles and bring them up to standards, not to lower our standards. -- Randykitty ( talk) 10:25, 15 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Why all this focus on bibliometrics? I think that the fact that his peers have seen fit to hold a conference honoring him is sufficient evidence of Elizalde's notability. His notability being established by such means, I'd even be tempted to delete mention of his h-index score. Stigmatella aurantiaca ( talk) 16:20, 13 November 2013 (UTC) reply