![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
With some references and organization, could be a B.
Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join
WikiProject Time or visit the
Time Portal for a list of articles that need improving.
—
Yamara
✉
16:10, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
The section "Electromagnetic Clock / Description" is talking about some specific design -- but it's not clear what. You refer to a circuit diagram ("In the presented diagram...") that isn't attached. 212.44.20.129 ( talk) 15:18, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Just a thought - should we make a mention of master/slave clocks or the Shortt-Synchronome clock? -- Roly ( talk) 13:57, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
I would like to add info/mention about master/slave systems ````
Please do - it is an important omission. I have added a link to the Synchronome page. g4oep
This article About power grid frequency from NBC seems to contradict what is in the section about accuracy. Anyone have more expertise than I on this? It's already marked as having no references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrentRockwood ( talk • contribs) 01:30, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Electric clock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:58, 19 September 2017 (UTC)