This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the
BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the
project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the
BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles
As obnoxious as our mutual friend may be, he has a point of sorts. Should we move the article to
Electric Ink (radio series) and leave the original title for the company? There are precedents for company articles as long as they don't rise to the level of advertising.— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Djdaedalus (
talk •
contribs)
According to google, there are a bunch of tattoo studios called Electric Ink, too. None of these companies appear to be notable enough for an article of their own, and until that happens there is no need to disambiguate this article's title with a clarifying phrase in brackets. This is covered in the guidelines on article titles, here:
WP:PRECISE.
Squiddy |
(squirt ink?)07:23, 25 June 2011 (UTC)reply
Good work. I vote for status quo as well. Maybe our friend will get his privileges back, and follow the advice he's already been given.
Djdaedalus (
talk)
15:35, 25 June 2011 (UTC)reply