This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This bit seems a bit random. I don't understand why some divisions have been picked out for mention when they all at one time or another were controlled through one or more of the Corps listed. At times they were under direct army command (when part of the army reserve for instance) but there were a number of other divisions that were as well (not to mention some brigades). We should either list all divisions or none. By the way, I don't think the Australian Corps was ever part of the Eighth Army OOB although it was part of Ninth Army in Syria / Transjordan before shipping to the Pacific theatre. I will remove change this if no-one counters this view here over the next day or so.
Stephen Kirragetalk -
contribs18:37, 26 July 2009 (UTC)reply
I agree about the Aussie Corps, i do not believe it was ever part of Eighth Army and should be removed - the Aussie divisions sure were but they were part of XIII and XXX Corps if memory serves. According to the I Corps article it took over from XIII Corps in the Western Desert before being transferred to Greece - personally am not to sure about that detail, surely Cyrenica (sp) Command (something like that) took over form the WDF/XIII Corps. But at any rate that was well before Eighth Army's time.
Further to what
Stephen Kirrage has pointed out above, the Americans are not mentioned in para 2 of the lede, but are in the 'Corps which passed through the Eighth Army' section.
Good spot. However, I can think of no occasion when either US IV Corps or 10th Mountain Div were ever subordinated to Eighth Army. As far as I recall they were both under US Fifth Army for the duration.
Stephen Kirragetalk -
contribs23:40, 30 October 2013 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Eighth Army (United Kingdom). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
I have just modified one external link on
Eighth Army (United Kingdom). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
I concur that the 7th Armored Division's nickname was the Desert Rats. However, there are some sources (poor ones and erroneous, in my opinion) out there that do apply the nickname to the entire army that does lead to confusion:
Google Books.
Depending on the context, the Durham Light Infantry's official war history (
here) is somewhat interesting as it states "... 7 Armoured Division (the original Desert Rats)..." while talking about the Eighth Army as a whole. That gives the impression that the nickname may have been appropriated or used outside of its original context; I know, OR on my part based off inferring what a source does not actually state.
Another interesting find is that the Long Range Desert Patrol also seems to have the nickname attached to them: several Imperial War Museum photos are labeled as such and are of the LRDP (and possibly the original SAS):
here and
here. This
1944 first-hand account appears to be stating the regular army had nicknamed the LRDP as the Desert Rats. I know these (and the DLI quote above) are not really evidence for the article or necessarily support the anon, it does provide examples that perhaps the nickname was applied a bit more liberally than assumed.
Interestingly, I have not been able to find any source that uses the term "Desert Rat" to describe the Eighth Army or the LRDP once the Italian campaign started; everything seems to hone back in on the 7th Arm Div. So, a nickname that left the original 'owners' and became widespread for a short while?
EnigmaMcmxc (
talk)
16:03, 4 July 2018 (UTC)reply
The term 'desert rats' was informally applied to a number of UK units operating in the Western desert but it became the formal appellation of the
7th Armoured Division with the issuance of the official badge featuring the
Jerboa. Publicity, press, newspapers, later applied the name to the 8th Army in its entirety. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
86.8.126.91 (
talk)
21:53, 3 May 2022 (UTC)reply