GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Khazar2 ( talk · contribs) 02:19, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi 69.248.115.128, thanks for your nomination of this important topic. I hope this gets to GA, but a glance at the page makes me wonder if this nomination's a bit premature. There's a proposed merge that still needs to be resolved, and it looks like there's some material that needs to be followed by inline citations that still doesn't have them. Examples:
Stats:
Quotes:
Also, the entire "Education and training" subsection is uncited, raising concerns that it's original research. Another small odd moment is that the list of "technological resources" includes two people (who presumably aren't androids, though that would be awesome). Finally, the lead doesn't appear to adequately summarize the article, as it doesn't even touch on the very long history section.
I don't mean to be discouraging--it'd be terrific to see this as a GA, and I hope you continue to work on it. It's just that you'll need to take care of some of the more obvious issues first (the full GA criteria can be found at WP:GA? for reference), and so I'm closing this for now. Please feel free to renominate as soon as these issues are addressed (or sooner, if you'd like a second opinion).
Good luck, and just let me know if you have any questions! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 02:19, 22 November 2013 (UTC)