![]() | A news item involving Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 29 June 2010. | ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement be
included in this article to
improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific
media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Fix the External link of "Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits" to "Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council", because the former does not have website, and the original link toward it points to a website providing one-side opinion on China-Taiwan relation. The change to Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council is appropriate since the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits is directly under control by the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council. Yaulaannl ( talk) 03:02, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Basically the original article was 2008 Taiwan-Mainland Cross Straits Economic Pact, this dealt with the opening of the Taiwanese economy such as the three links. That article was fine.
Some people got confused and thought it was the ECFA. The ECFA hasn't been signed, it is a proposed comprehensive economic framework. This article shouldn't be about the ECFA 2008 because the 2008 Taiwan-Mainland Cross Straits Economic Pact wasn't an ECFA but more of a general agreement in opening up transport links.
To remedy the situation, I think the 2008 Taiwan-Mainland Cross Straits Economic Pact must be re-instated and the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement should be where the info about the proposed agreement should be residing in. -- Visik ( talk) 08:31, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
-- Visik ( talk) 08:41, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
I tried to verify information using the sources provided for the "2008 Taiwan-Mainland Cross Straits Economic Pact" page, but of the two source the first was talking about the "Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement" and the second was just making general comments about how desperate Ma is to integration Taiwan with China. If you want to restore the article, find some better and more precise sources.
Also, unless there is a source for the name "Taiwan-Mainland Cross Straits Economic Pact", we need to use a more neutral description such as "Taiwan-Mainland China Cross Straits Economic Pact" or simply "Cross Straits Economic Pact".
Readin (
talk)
00:37, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
The English in this article is atrocious. It badly needs to be cleaned up.
84.154.104.46 (
talk)
13:13, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
To be translated:
她说,签订ECFA后,台湾会越来越依赖大陆, 其他国家和台湾的贸易量会减少,也就更没有兴趣和台湾商讨自由贸易协定了。
她说,因为有 WTO协定,现在台湾产品在大陆并没有受到关税歧视,而且台湾的主要竞争者韩国和日本也并没有和大陆签订自由贸易协定,所以不存在签订ECFA的紧迫性: " 当你的主要竞争者,日本和韩国和中国没有FTA(自由贸易协定)的时候,有这么急吗? 。"
The Background section contained some unnecessary POV statements. I've cleaned it up but the article could really use a complete overhaul. -- Ben Applegate ( talk) 05:38, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
It would really help to explain what the ECFA entails. Without that, the whole article is superfluous. -- BsBsBs ( talk) 11:58, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Am I reading this right? There is a huge controversy about a trade agreement, but nobody seems to know what's in it? -- BsBsBs ( talk) 21:59, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
( RollingWave ( talk) 09:43, 21 July 2010 (UTC))
need something there, there were protests in Taiwan against this agreement (possible china?) Lihaas ( talk) 12:11, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
By that question, I'm not asking about the content of the agreement -- I mean the nature of the document itself. It's obviously not a treaty, because neither government recognizes the other as legitimate. In fact, both (officially) view the other as a renegade government in control of part of the other's territory. So how are these clashing viewpoints massaged in the document? -- Jfruh ( talk) 20:52, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
I'm just a casual reader (I don't edit), and I had some issues understanding the abbreviations found in this article. Possibly link the first instance of each abbreviation to a relevant article (such as FTA to Free Trade Agreement, or whatever it is)?
98.115.222.41 ( talk) 21:39, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
rʨanaɢ ( talk) 23:09, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
a preferential trade agreement between the governments of the People's Republic of China (mainland China) and the Republic of China (Taiwan)
i dont see any of those governments signing anything, i see 2 semi official bodies, be them ARATS and MAC, signing it, but keep pushing ur agendas, that wont change realities —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.40.114.56 ( talk) 15:24, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 23:20, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:45, 16 September 2017 (UTC)