This article is
related to the Museum of Modern Art.Museum of Modern ArtWikipedia:GLAM/Museum of Modern ArtTemplate:WikiProject Museum of Modern ArtMuseum of Modern Art-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Industrial design, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Industrial design on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Industrial designWikipedia:WikiProject Industrial designTemplate:WikiProject Industrial designIndustrial design articles
Anyone know why this chair is so important it is found in museums and is a highly sought after collectors piece? I'd love to know more about the history of it!
Fxer06:12, 21 April 2006 (UTC)reply
Part of the reason there is still so much hype around it is related to the fact that it's still considered a 'modern classic' after 50 years. This year is actually the 50th year anniversary. Also, you don't always find comfort paired with innovative design. Check out www.hermanmiller.com for more information/history on the Eames Lounge and Ottoman. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Bnj2377 (
talk •
contribs)
20:05, 10 September 2006 (UTC)reply
Requested move 24 August 2014
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
See
here. As I would have expected, most cases of all-three-capitalized "Eames Lounge Chair" are in headings which (WP notwithstanding) are almost always written in title case. The product is the Eames Chair, model number 670. It has some variants that include the word chair, like "Eames Lounge Chair Wood", but this article isn't about them in particular. "Chair" is a disambiguator that some sources are adding, and we don't seem to have a reason to capitalize it. I would otherwise, but too many sources indicate it is not actually a part of the formal name of the product/design. Similarly, my MacPro is a MacPro computer, not a MacPro Computer, despite the fact that I can find some sources that refer to it with such over-capitalization. —
SMcCandlish ☺☏¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 11:33, 2 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Perhaps, but "lounge" is ambiguous. It is usually a room, but some people use it to mean chair. Let's not change an unambiguous article title to an ambiguous one.
Ground Zero |
t16:57, 11 September 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.