This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Aircraft / Gliding This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met Associated projects or task forces: /  This article is supported by the aircraft project. This article is supported by the gliding project. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Switzerland Start‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I have removed the deletion tag. Many aircraft covered in Wikipedia articles are one-offs for various reasons but may still be notable. Not all are as well known as (say) the Bell X-1 or Bristol Brabazon but if they were discussed and described in detail at the time or have since featured in summarising publications, they are notable in WikiP terms. TSRL ( talk) 09:26, 4 September 2017 (UTC) reply

I agree that the type is notable. It was built, flew and gained enough attention to be written up in reliable sources, such as Janes, so it makes WP:GNG on that basis alone. Less famous than the X-1, but still in the same category, as an experimental type that spawned later developments by other builders. - Ahunt ( talk) 11:25, 4 September 2017 (UTC) reply