This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
E-I-E-I-(Annoyed Grunt) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | E-I-E-I-(Annoyed Grunt) was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (August 10, 2020). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image:E-I-E-I-(Annoyed Grunt).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 06:54, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Having come across this article, I could not understand for the life of me what (Annoyed Grunt) meant. When I reached it and saw that it was actually "D'oh", it made perfect sense. Why is the article named this way, as I'm sure the actual episode was named "d'oh"?!? This needs to be changed for clarity, as the title prestns a double-title for the episode that is both confusing and not true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Varkstuff ( talk • contribs) 17:52, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
No! In all the Simpsons scripts you will read Annoyed Grunt instead of D'oh. That D'oh is the creation of Dan Castellaneta because there was no description how Annoyed Grunt has to sound. And the official title is E-I-E-I-(Annoyed Grunt) and not E-I-E-I-D'oh. -- 77.181.68.247 ( talk) 11:07, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on E-I-E-I-(Annoyed Grunt). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:04, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 11:52, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Kingsif ( talk · contribs) 19:18, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Kingsif, and I'll be doing this review. This is an automated message that helps keep the bot updating the nominated article's talkpage working and allows me to say hi. Feel free to reach out and, if you think the review has gone well, I have some open GA nominations that you could (but are under no obligation to) look at. Kingsif ( talk) 19:18, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
@ AmericanAir88: July reminder ping :) Again, if you need time to work on it without GANR looming over you, just let me know, but it seems close enough to pass it shouldn't be much work left! Kingsif ( talk) 12:48, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
especially its "blatant historical inaccuracies" which sees the film feature Zorro, King Arthur, the Three Musketeers, the Scarlet Pimpernel, the Man in the Iron Mask and ninjas in nineteenth century Mexico.", there's another quotation mark at the end - is this extraneous or is part of the list a quotation?
, writing: "Homer's attempts to be a farmer in 'E-I-E-I-(Annoyed Grunt)' involve using plutonium as a fertilizer. DNA from tobacco seeds and tomato seeds blend to produce a fruit that tastes like ashtray, but is nonetheless 'refreshingly addictive'."can just be removed
Remembering the article in a textbook, Baur cultivated real tomacco in 2003- what article (needs clarifying in the article)? Is it the scientific journal? If so, is he really inspired by the Simpsons, then?
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 23:08, 27 March 2023 (UTC)