This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Canoeing and Kayaking, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Canoeing and KayakingWikipedia:WikiProject Canoeing and KayakingTemplate:WikiProject Canoeing and KayakingCanoeing and Kayaking articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles
This page has been
transwikied to
Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at
Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either
here or
here (
logs 1logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger
CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from
Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.
The common meaning (of "duluth pack") and also the title/subject with a lower case "P" is a type of pack used for canoeing. Much of the wording capitalizes both words and uses it as a synonym for a particular company. I plan to fix that. North8000 (
talk)
23:35, 27 July 2012 (UTC)reply
I partially fixed it. The "duluth pack" portion of it needs to be expanded, and more work is still needed in other areas. North8000 (
talk)
23:56, 27 July 2012 (UTC)reply
Two remaining links to commercial sites
Especially since we don't have any pictures, and that this article is about a product, I think that these are useful?
Including to the company where the title somewhat seems to be about their product specifically. ?
The
Duluth pack article is a mess because half of it is about the Duluth Pack company rather than that style of pack (which is made by many different companies). The Duluth Pack company is famous notable, and easily wp:notable. I am solving the problem by "splitting" the article. Actually starting the Duluth Pack company article and moving much of the company material from the
Duluth pack article to here.
Yes, but Duluth Tent & Awning = Duluth Pack company, with the Duluth Pack being a product of that company. Maybe in the year 1900 these were all called "Duluth packs" due to limited availability(?), but I've never heard anyone refer to other brands of portage packs as "Duluth packs." Do you know of other historic manufacturers of Duluth packs that can be added to the article? Thanks!
↳Hyperik (
talk)
01:22, 10 September 2018 (UTC)reply
The Duluth packs we used (this was 50+ years ago) were green canvas box packs with very uncomfortable cotton webbing shoulder straps. We padded the straps with our sweatshirts. There was no brand name on them and they didn't look like the current ones sold by Duluth Packs; perhaps they were just a generic brand. They were a cheap way of carrying a lot of stuff for Girl Scouts on both foot travel to campsites as well as canoe trips. This was before freeze-dried stuff for campers, and wholesale quantities of canned goods came packed in cardboard boxes two layers deep. If you split the boxes horizontally then one layer of cans, box and all, slid easily into a Duluth pack.
StarryGrandma (
talk)
01:37, 11 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Without getting into too much personal detail, hundreds of not thousands of times I've heard of packs of this style not made by Duluth Tent & Awning/Duluth Pack company referred to as duluth packs. The same for the common large envelope shaped one as a #3 and a large one with set-outs (box shaped) as a #4. There should have been discussion before removing that work and prod'ing this. North8000 (
talk)
01:47, 11 September 2018 (UTC)reply
Hyperik, you are making big changes all over the place towards your personal vision of this without discussing. Pleas stop and discuss. The most / main discussion appears to be here at
Duluth pack Thanks. North8000 (
talk)
01:57, 11 September 2018 (UTC)reply