![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Image:Drem-multimedia-logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 20:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
I cleaned up the external links section: I removed spam, a members only site, and unofficial/fan sites, wikis, and forums. Because of this I removed the {{Cleanup-spam}} tag. Gh5046 ( talk) 01:05, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
I don't think that the VU+ box should be mentioned at the Dreambox article since it is none, it's a receiver by a different company and should not be mixed up with dreamboxes. Enigma2 runs on many receivers and none are mentioned here (and should not be either).
I do agree that Vu+Duo is not at Dreambox, but I does use Enigma2, and is the box that is most similar to a dreambox, so its easy to port image too it. Vu+Duo are added with a comment that it's not a dreambox. Jotne ( talk) 08:45, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
VU+ Duo IS NOT A Dreambox. Even if the tuner uses the same OS, it does not belong in a Dreambox comparison chart. Nor does a Mercedes in a BMW chart even if both use Diesel engines. The chart is a Dreambox chart not an enigma 2 chart. -- Digsat ( talk) 21:37, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
This part has been here for a long time and it is clearly mention that it is not a dreambox and added for easy comparison.-- Jotne ( talk) 17:06, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
This is about dreambox and not about Compareing enigma2 boxe - humsat — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Humsat (
talk •
contribs)
17:53, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
I did not add this, just updated article. Contribute and not delete information.-- Jotne ( talk) 17:58, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Many people has removed this information before and you have readded the VU+ every time even if a majority of the contributors do not want this information here. Just refer to the VU+ page. This is the Dreambox page having facts and information about set-top boxes from Dream Multimedia GmbH. Having another box in the comparison table only leads to misunderstandings. Please respect the opinions of others. -- Akseln ( talk) 18:12, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Strange that only new user that have not contributed any to wiki removed information. And all user are from Digsat.net.-- Jotne ( talk) 18:22, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Removed non Dreambox from comparison chart, it's not a dreambox and does not belong there. Information being there for a long time does not make VU+Duo a Dreambox. -- Digsat ( talk) 20:24, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Since there are sveral people that do like to have it there, and it does not decrease quality of article I will readd it until some complain to wikipedia, and they do decide that it should not be there.-- Jotne ( talk) 20:38, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Destroying the history log like this is not needed. Do follow the rule. If some do not agree, do report it the correct way. -- Jotne ( talk) 21:04, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
A complaint has been sendt to wikipedia about this wrong info being re added by the user jotne over and over again.-- Digsat ( talk) 21:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
To focus on the facts. A lot of pages in Wikipedia describes companies and their products. Many of these pages list a history of that company´s products so that readers may learn about past and present products from that company. This is also true regarding the Dreambox page. Any products from other companies presented on another company´s page compromises this information and may mislead the readers. How should this alien information be treated in the future when new products are released? Should a company be allowed to add their products to a competitors page on Wikipedia for comparison? There are other sites on the Internet that provides product comparison charts. This should not be done in Wikipedia. Please keep this company page clean from other products. -- Akseln ( talk) 21:40, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Stop removing page and wait for wiki to settle.-- Jotne ( talk) 21:54, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
Wiki will not decide, therefore the non dreambox model have been removed from chart once again. You can add a line or two in the bottom of this article where you can mention VU+Duo as a competitor to dreambox but not i the the model chart. The chart should be reserved for Dream Multimedia brands only. Likewise in the VU+ chart in this page. The current Dreambox models does not belong there and should not be added as the chart is reserved for VU+ brand only. Does Jotne agree in this? If not, would it be ok for us to add a model or five in the VU page? -- Digsat ( talk) 01:52, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
This article will stay like this. I have contribute alot to it, Digsat has not. Deleting my user and block me from www.digsat.net is just childish to do. Doing so, makes me even more sure that it stay like this. I have done nothing wrong to digsat--
Jotne (
talk)
07:46, 29 December 2010 (UTC).
Removing jotne from digsat is irrelevant on this pages and will not be answered or commented any further. But the last answer from jotne clearly show a childish behavior and maybe a thing for you to think about.-- Digsat ( talk) 08:29, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
It is not irrelevant, I was removed after Digsat started to edit this thread. I did not pull Digsat.net into this, it was you that did it. This just show how Digsat.net handles it users. I told you how to handle this and Digsat did not respect the rules of Wikipedia. PS I did not start this, I have been here long. -- Jotne ( talk) 09:11, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Stop edit warring. It's been going on for weeks. I have protected this article for 1 week. During that time you can all either resolve your differences here or seek the relevent dispute resolution. Fainites barley scribs 22:37, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
References
I've re-removed the section "Alternative firmware" per WP:ELNO and WP:NOT#REPOSITORY. It had been restored by Jotne ( talk · contribs), but he didn't address any of the removal reasons in the restoration.
Per WP:NOT#REPOSITORY, Wikipedia is not a "collections of external links or Internet directories". Wikipedia does not exist to be a link farm. This is further reinforced by WP:EL, "External links should not normally be used in the body of an article", as well as WP:ELNO #4 and #14.
If anyone disagrees, please explain why you feel these policies and guidelines don't apply and try to reach consensus - or bring it up at the external links noticeboard if you want a broader discussion on interpretation of site policies and guidelines in relation to these specific links. --- Barek ( talk) - 16:04, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
This site are links to sites that sells dreambox or clones. It does not belong here and will be removed. h**p://www.dreamboxok.com/ h**p://www.dreamboxs-store.co.uk Jotne ( talk) 10:49, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
I do not see why this belong here, please discuss here before post. Jotne ( talk) 18:32, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Typical techie article, totally useless to lay readers. Can anyone with rudimentary communication skills please edit this nonsense so it becomes a useful, brief encyclopaedia entry for people who want to look it up? Sartoresartus ( talk) 11:37, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Dreambox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:34, 16 December 2016 (UTC)