![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
Hello, I added a link to this review of the Dream Director experience - http://www.culture24.org.uk/art/live+%2526+public+art/art67440, which was deleted. I realise that I put it in as an external link rather than a citation, which I now know was wrong. Was it deleted because it wasn't a citation, or because the article doesn't need another review, or because I have a conflict of interest - or all of the above? (Disclaimer: i work for Culture24.) Am not arguing with your decision but would just like to double check what I should be doing differently in future. Thanks very much! RosieClarke ( talk) 14:40, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Dream Director. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:05, 16 December 2016 (UTC)