This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Although it's not a very high quality article, there is some information and sources that would probably help this article.
Considering that the CCDP's implementation will be the CDB, I think it's worth merging the two articles (or at least redirecting the CCDP to this) -- M2Ys4U ( talk) 08:52, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
From my first searches it looks like there is an ongoing association between the "black boxes" and Detica. I haven't presently demonstrated the relevance of Detica's ( Streamshield Networks) role as a funding member of the Internet Watch Foundation [1] and as a partner of the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre, [2] though it sounds like a related application. If anyone can deliver more detail on the black boxes - a picture of one, or what the rules are for ISP employees who so much as think about touching one, etc., please do! Wnt ( talk) 23:13, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
I'm sorry I haven't provided (any) references but I've added the bits I think are missing. refs should be easy enough to find. Jim Killock (talk) 15:57, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
useful links — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coachtripfan ( talk • contribs) 13:53, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
I don't wish to edit this page directly, as I work at the World Wide Web Foundation. But I wanted to point out that the quotes from Anne Jellema, Web Foundation CEO on this page used on this page are not related to the draft Communications Data Bill, but rather refer to the draft Investigatory Powers Bill. Perhaps they should be moved to the draft Investigatory Powers Bill page, or the attribution made clear.
Allthingslegal ( talk) 10:07, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
This article is very one-sided. It seems like it was all written by and for people who are against this bill, dedicated to refuting it. There is no representation of any other point of view. This is not the sort of standard one would expect to see in an encyclopaedia. The article on the Draft Investigatory Powers Bill (although not finished) is an example of a much more neutral article. 92.20.169.62 ( talk) 20:34, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Draft Communications Data Bill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:00, 13 September 2017 (UTC)