![]() | This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
![]() | This is the
talk page of a
redirect that targets the page: • Chinglish Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Chinglish |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To save more people making the mistake of trying to have this redirect deleted with a prod or a speedy delete tag, let me point out the applicable principles:
1. "Additionally, only articles may be proposed for deletion using {{ prod}}. Deletion of other pages, including redirects, should be proposed at the appropriate deletion page or tagged for speedy deletion, if applicable."
2. "If a page has survived a prior deletion discussion, it may not be speedily deleted, except in the case of newly discovered copyright infringements."
This is a redirect, therefore ground 1 applies and a prod cannot be used. Those checking the talk page and / or the history before tagging this redirect for deletion (as they should) will notice that this redirect has survived a prior attempt at deletion at WP:RFD; therefore ground 2 applies and a speedy delete tag cannot be used.
If you are unsure of the principles of using prod and / or speedy delete, please check before use. Regards, Bencherlite Talk 17:38, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Why is this unencyclopedic $#!! preserved, why can't an admin use WP:IAR and delete this? I see we get bogged down in red tape and petty policies where this is clear against anything that Wikipedia stands for. man with one red shoe 18:36, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
I see no link or reason? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andy Lowson ( talk • contribs) 21:08, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
This redirect has no place in an encyclopedia. If it has any merit then it should be written as it's own article or a paragraph in the main article. Spacemonkeynz ( talk) 09:21, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Am I the only one who thinks this should be retargeted to thou shalt not covet? Perhaps turn the page into a disambiguation? I would use RFD but this has probably been discussed before. -- User J. Dalek ( talk | contribs) 02:06, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
This should be redirected to Star_Wars:_Episode_III_–_Revenge_of_the_Sith because it's a double redirect. Niceguy149 ( talk • contributions • logs) 21:26, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
#REDIRECT [[Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith#Leaked workprint]] {{Redirect category shell| {{R from meme}} {{R to section}} {{R printworthy}} }}