This article was nominated for deletion on 3 December 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
District 187: Sin Streets article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "District 187: Sin Streets" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Arghya Roy wrote at the deletion discussion page:
This should be discussed here because it's basically a content dispute. I removed the "Hacking" section because there never were reliable sources confirming its content, it read like an essay, and it contained clearly off-topic content. In the version I edited it was completely unsourced, and the only source that even mentioned hacking security was this one, a copy of this article which for all I can tell is user-submitted content without any editorial oversight and thus not reliable - and even if it were, all it says about security is that District 187's approach was the reason for massive lag problems that delayed the launch for a month and apparently still are only fixed in a rather haphazard way. Similarly, I removed the requirements because there was no source for them; I believe even the unreliable sources only mentioned the required amount of disk space. And regarding the release date, Metacritic says it was November 27. I suspect they got it wrong, but you'll have to find a better source for the correct date. Finally, you don't own the article, and by writing content on Wikipedia you automatically agree that it may be edited by others. Judging by the opinions already expressed at AfD I don't expect you would have enjoyed "your own" article much longer anyway. It seemed bound for deletion. Huon ( talk) 03:09, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
ok thanks for replying.I didn't know the requirement in the picture section need ref support too?,I didn't find any article like of this type.
[1],
[2],
[3]- do we need to put these links as refs i.e. references?If the community is so concerned about sources why they don't look the sources at old articles or when those were created.articles like counter strike:GO,CS: CZ and some old other types of articles really contain some bad sources but were accepted.
Arghya Roy (
talk)
04:31, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on District 187: Sin Streets. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:31, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on District 187: Sin Streets. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:27, 11 September 2017 (UTC)