A fact from Discrimination based on nationality appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 July 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Pass: article is fully eligible—itself well-written, free of copyright violations or plagiarism, and adequately cited. QPQ done. Hook strikes me as super interesting, and is also verified by source. I do wish to note however that the article is presently involved in a merge discussion, so perhaps that would have to be cleared up before this gets queued. 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (
💬)
02:37, 7 July 2022 (UTC)reply
theleekycauldron What's an active discussion vs an inactive one? Only two comments (one in favor, one opposed), last comment was almost 2 weeks ago. No sign of consensus developing to merge. The rationale is poorly thought out as well. (
t ·
c) buidhe14:57, 12 July 2022 (UTC)reply
Discussions don't need to be formally closed. If you think so,
theleekycauldron, why not close it yourself? I think it's unreasonable to shut down a DYK over any request regardless of its likelihood of actually being implemented. (
t ·
c) buidhe00:29, 13 July 2022 (UTC)reply