This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This is a good article but it does not elaborate on why Morris turned against the Clintons. What happened-- what was the reason?
I have persnally speculated but have no idea-- is he really a Republican with a mercenary streak who regrets having served a Democratic president? Or is he a legitimate Centrist and were there other reasons?
One thing is-- as far as Hillary goes-- it seems very personal. Like he has a grudge against her. If so, I don't trust him. Politics should be based on principles and should not be personal.
Plenty of negatives here. Wow could a man be so invloved and sought after and be so bad at his job? Who writes this stuff. And OH my he even has a grudge.... — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
204.124.152.10 (
talk)
10:29, 29 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Sean Hannity seems to have come to dislike Morris. I have seen Hannity get very annoyed with him on FOX. Hannity does not like the Clintons-- but doesn't seem to like Morris anymore either.
If anyone knows why Morris turned on the Clintons-- that should be a key part of this article I would think.
I see Dick Morris a lot and he seems very focused on Hillary Clinton, not Bill. Just because he worked as an advisor and whatnot to Bill does not mean in any way he would support Hillary. So the idea that he "turned" on the Clintons wouldn't necessarily be accurate. I doubt he has a "mercenary streak," you can work for the president for a few days and return to the private sector with an incredible job and pay... if you wanted to make baseless speculations it could be that he used to support Bill, maybe he wanted to win ("I'm the guy who got Bill to win") maybe he thought of Bill as a friend, and wanted to help someone who he knew would listen to him as an advisor, who knows- doesn't really matter I guess though.
As to Sean Hannity- I see the two together a lot, I don't get that vibe really at all. Maybe a mild annoyance at times, but that might very simply be Morris' love of Alan. Most conservatives pander to Sean, and liberals to Alan- Morris loves Alan because he clearly loves to annoy him and give him a hard time. Other than that Sean has a much more moderate (not politically, but he's not "fantastic," or over the top) approach while Morris has a very intense nature. Just a few moments ago I saw Morris talk about how Michigan is going to be the most crucial state for republicans, if Romney loses it's over for him yadda yadda- Sean tried to interject (interupted by commercial break) that it isn't that simple and clear cut. Again, for wikipedia unimportant, but hopefully this can shed a little more light on the question(s).--
67.185.245.221 (
talk)
08:58, 9 January 2008 (UTC)reply
My speculation is that the Clintons cut him off completely after the scandal in 1996. They did not want to be associated with him in an election year. Morris probably thought that his access would never be cut off. Hillary Clinton and Dick Morris probably also have some policy disagreements with Dick Morris arguing that Hillary Clinton's policy agenda was politically unviable.
Jmegill (
talk)
12:52, 9 January 2008 (UTC)reply
I wanted to add to my comments before, I remember Karl Rove in an interview talked about how like he just loved politics, in the beginning it wasn't about an ideology, it was just the republicans (in college maybe) that "took him in." Maybe Dick Morris just likes politics, back then it was about helping Clinton, maybe today he decided he doesn't like Clinton or he sees attacking the Clintons as his ticket to stay in politics. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
198.29.0.100 (
talk)
23:13, 11 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Please avoid putting personal opinions into articles
Look at this sentence currently in the article "Many[attribution needed] perceived this as a move to the center of the political spectrum, and it disappointed some[attribution needed] who had hoped Clinton would pursue a more liberal policy.[citation needed]"
Note the things wrong with it:
Use of vague actors. Often the "people think" is just a way to get around saying "I think". Change the wording here: I saw this as a move to the center and it dissapointed me because I wanted Clinton to be more liberal." Who wants to lay betting odds that the original author feels this way?
Change in subject: Is the article about Morris or Clinton or what (liberal) people think of Clinton?
Placement of concernt: The author apparently thinks it's noteworthy what liberals think, but not conservatives!
(For last two, given, that the article is about MORRIS, if we have ANY of this tripe, it might be more pertinent to say how disappointed conservatives were that Morris was helping the enemy.) —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
TCO (
talk •
contribs)
18:43, 26 April 2008 (UTC)reply