This article is supported by WikiProject Dentistry. If you want to participate and/or join, please visit the project page, or ask questions on the project talk page.DentistryWikipedia:WikiProject DentistryTemplate:WikiProject Dentistrydentistry articles
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 April 2019 and 5 June 2019. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Wherm001.
I thought armamentarium was quite pretentious, whatever was i thinking, noone will look that up. 'Dental instruments' seems a much more logical name for this page. I hope everyone agrees (
Bouncingmolar07:34, 13 February 2007 (UTC))reply
Mos’Def’ agreement: Dentistry has improved in civility and effectiveness by leaps and bounds, since a
Hartford dentist (now long since memorialized with a plaque (memorial) (& IIRC, at least a personal
plinth in that city’s
Bushnell Park. I dinn’a recall his name, but I think I hunted it down, after a colleague submitted a photo of it in one of our image-building drives or competitions. (I think he was imprisoned over the death of a patient … IIRC bcz of excessive
ether. (... Hmmm.
Priestly first used use oxygen, I think, as a tonic, but was probably a Brit, even earlier, and purely a non-medical researcher. .... or was that that “frog”
Lavoisier?... —
2601:199:C201:FD70:20C7:3126:33A0:DA06 (
talk) ex-
user:JerzyA (who will be useless at the polls, if ’e don’ go t’bed....) Bye
07:43, 3 November 2020 (UTC)reply
I'll be able to help with that. Though, it might be a little tricky getting pictures of everything if each object will have its own picture. Also, if you do not mind me asking, what is your affilition with dentistry? I know you have done a lot of contributing to dental related articles. -
Dozenisttalk00:07, 27 July 2006 (UTC)reply
Yeah, though medicine and dentistry overlaps at times, the WikiDentistry project may be a better forum to discuss the quality of this article, but the project has not set up a method to evaluate all dental articles. Maybe we should start one? What do you think? -
Dozenisttalk21:23, 31 October 2006 (UTC)reply
It's a good idea, but I don't think we even have enough people contributing yet in order to have some working on quality assessments. Ideally, we would have a system in place, a 'peer review' of a sort, representing a diverse range of scientific backgrounds and opinions. If you think it can be done, I will participate.
Dr-G - Illigetimi nil carborundum est.22:11, 31 October 2006 (UTC)reply
Support merger. Added the Template:MedInst to this page. Requesting a tabulation of the content like
Instruments used in general medicine. Mere GMP; have no idea about dentistry or else I myself would have tinkered. Believe a tabulation would be better. Sarindam7 13:27, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
This article cites almost no peer-reviewed sources of information. Can someone back the descriptions of various tools and other claims with actual peer-reviewed sources? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
68.84.199.178 (
talk)
19:32, 17 June 2019 (UTC)reply