This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment / Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group. This article is supported by the science and academia work group. Physics: Biographies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce. Women writers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

And I would suggest be deleted, honestly. Also, this person is not a physicist and, while I found her in an optics journal publishing with a chemist, is clearly not well-educated in physics from her solo writings. 99.135.144.233 ( talk) 03:12, 23 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Thank you User:Beeblebrox - in its current form this article is OK. It is now neutral and reasonably palatable. Jamesx12345 ( talk) 21:30, 15 December 2012 (UTC) reply

This article is now basically a short stub due to the removal of material that did not adhere to a neutral point of view and material that was not biographical in nature. I am looking for sources that could be used to turn this into a proper biography but most of what I have found so far is either too brief or trivial to be useful, blatant reprints of press release type material, or written by Zohar herself. Beeblebrox ( talk) 21:42, 15 December 2012 (UTC) reply

I think in its current form it is as good as it is going to be. All her published material, including spiritual intelligence, needs work as it is somewhat biased. Jamesx12345 ( talk) 21:53, 15 December 2012 (UTC) reply