This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article has been
automatically rated by a
bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a
stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
To be included in Wikipedia, you must show that a company meets
WP:CORP. All articles must meet
WP:N and
WP:V. Also, no original research is allowed per
WP:OR. If you get to work providing information following the guidelines, your article will not have a problem.
Mattisse(talk)20:28, 10 August 2006 (UTC)reply
Article issues
This article was created in 2006 using the company "official website" in the "External links" section as sourcing . This goes against several
policies and guidelines, that at best is company
advertising or
promotion just providing a Wikipedia
business listing, as well as issues mentioned in the "Untitled" section above. Claims of
original research cannot be argued against.
It is easy to
ignore the "rules" and create articles, which should only take place when there are clear benefits to Wikipedia and still subjected to
consensus, but 12 years later we are at the same place. If there is no sourcing or the article can not be merged to some sourced parent article then it should be deleted.
Otr500 (
talk)
18:26, 22 September 2018 (UTC)reply