Curtiss XBT2C has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: December 31, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 17:26, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
I'll get to this after Boxing Day. ♦
jaguar
17:26, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
I'm going to pass this outright. I've read through the article twice and as evidenced from the lack of issues, it meets the GA criteria on all counts. It is comprehensive, well written and the sources of course all check out. The lead may appear short to some, but I believe it summarises the article fine without resorting to extending for the sake of it. I enjoyed reading this one. ♦ jaguar 13:54, 31 December 2020 (UTC)