This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Curriculum of the Waldorf schools article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
And where is maths in all of this?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajr1212 ( talk • contribs)
User:Alexbrn, if you excise texts in this page and the other off-shoot pages, it will make it considerably harder for me to work on the curriculum section on the Waldorf Education main page as I agreed to do. I can't follow you all over wiki. Please slow down and work with other editors who are trying to discuss things before making changes. I don't see any egregious self-serving claims being made here. And Rist & Schneider isn't exactly self-published. It was a UNESCO working paper/white paper. Perhaps eventually some of these citations can be replaced with other sources but there is no urgency. When accompanying text is excised it's hard to get a sense for the content that has been removed. The potential result is that the page becomes devoid of precisely the kind of descriptions people are looking for when they come here. Selected quotes can only go so far in creating overall useful descriptions. Please, please allow the chance for other editors to reflect on content and discuss it. As it stands now, a majority of these pages have been written or highly edited by you. Wikipedia is supposed to be collaborative and open. Most people don't have hours upon hours to devote to this. We all need to act in ways that allow others to participate no matter their level of interest and time. Thank you. Jellypear ( talk) 23:58, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
These are works published in peer reviewed journals, not the university research reports. Clearly RSs hgilbert ( talk) 13:55, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
I think this sub page would be more informative if the subjects and the order in which they are typically offered to students could be incorporated. I see no other way of doing this than to rely on internal Waldorf sources. This is allowable in the Arbcom decision for non-controversial claims. Thoughts? Jellypear ( talk) 17:57, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
This is essentially an advertisement for the school, presenting its methods without discussing how they are distinctive from the usual methods, if indeed they are--I know that I was not able to gain any actual information from the article, tho I was from some of the references in the main article. At present, it's as if I were to write an article on Curriculum of the Boston public school system, and parallel ones for others. DGG ( talk ) 05:46, 14 July 2013 (UTC)