This redirect is part of the WikiProject Limnology and Oceanography to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the inland waters and marine environments. The aim is to write
neutral and
well-referenced articles on limnology- or oceanography-related topics, as well as to ensure that limnology and oceanography articles are properly
categorized. Read
Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the
project talk page.Limnology and OceanographyWikipedia:WikiProject Limnology and OceanographyTemplate:WikiProject Limnology and OceanographyLimnology and Oceanography articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
This redirect is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve
ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles
This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the
importance scale.
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 January 2020 and 7 April 2020. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Abbyfah. Peer reviewers:
BrdvltLB,
Devlin Vong,
Tandoori Jones,
Rosabelaka.
Should this be merged with the main eutrophication article?
Reply from Matkang: It should be merged with the main eutrophication article and even to water pollution articles. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Matkang (
talk •
contribs)
12:27, 18 February 2008 (UTC)reply
Agree. This does not need to be a free standing article, but at best a paragraph or section in the eutrophication article. A mention in water pollution, though etrophication can also happen in soil environments as well. —
Gaffταλκ13:28, 4 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Agree , but as suggested above, much of it could find its way into
Nutrient pollution. I propose that it is all merged into Eutrophication and then significant chunks are moved to Nutrient pollution. Merging it in two stages with appropriate edit summaries and notes on talk pages will preserve the history better than selective merging across two different articles. VelellaVelella Talk 07:48, 28 May 2021 (UTC)reply
I won't realistically have a chance to do any serious editing until after 12th June, but this will probably wait till then. VelellaVelella Talk 07:42, 1 June 2021 (UTC)reply
Agree. There is not much in this article that is worth salvaging or merging. Much of the text contains errors and rather amateurish formulations. Some of it is even comical eg "Conversation Tillage" (last line). Simplest would be to take the article out of its misery and cancel it. The term cultural eutrophication can be included and explained in the main
eutrophication article. Regarding the article on
nutrient pollution this contains worthwhile material which could be merged into the main eutrophication article.
Velella and
EMsmileASRASR (
talk)
19:37, 1 June 2021 (UTC)reply