![]() | Cu Lao Cham Marine Park was nominated as a Geography and places good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 22, 2019). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Cu Lao Cham Marine Park appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 20 May 2010 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cu Lao Cham Marine Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
https://www.vietnamtourism-jsc.com/360-travel/detail/26-cham-island-vietnam-–-a-part-of-the-world’s-lung.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:09, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Cwmhiraeth ( talk · contribs) 10:07, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
I propose reviewing this article which I see has been waiting nearly 8 months for review.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk)
10:07, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
Nobody seems to be taking responsibility for this review so I am putting the review on hold for seven days. The main deficit is in Criteria 3a and 3b. The article is insufficiently broad in its coverage of the topic, but is too detailed in its approach to certain aspects, the swallows for example. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 19:54, 13 April 2019 (UTC)