This article is written in
British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
Croatia was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the
good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
This article was
copy edited by
Folklore1, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on October 25, 2011.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Countries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
countries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CountriesWikipedia:WikiProject CountriesTemplate:WikiProject Countriescountry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Europe, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
European topics of a cross-border nature on Wikipedia.EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject EuropeTemplate:WikiProject EuropeEurope articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Article has "This section needs to be updated" tags in five sections: Economy, Transport, Demographics, Education, Sports, and As of 2019, the Croatian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and European Integration employed 1,381[needs update]. It also has "needs additional citations for verification" tag for Sports, and a 'citation needed' in Healthcare section. 'clarification needed' is in Independent Croatia (1991–present) section. With 6 big orange templates article needs work to remain a GA.
Artem.G (
talk) 19:00, 16 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Slightly longer than preferable, and with some oversubsectioning. However, overall not a bad article as far as country articles go, hopefully this can be fixed.
CMD (
talk) 07:54, 17 January 2023 (UTC)reply
Delist: sections need to be updated, while citations are needed in selected places. As CMD noted, should be fairly easy to get back to GA standard, should someone wish to.
~~ AirshipJungleman29 (
talk) 14:17, 27 January 2023 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Croatia definitely not in Central Europe
Any strong source that classifies it in Central Europe? It is definitely in South-East Europe, Slovenia being the most southern Central Europe country.
77.77.216.179 (
talk) 19:31, 11 March 2024 (UTC)reply
text s/b Charles VI, Holy Roman Emperor (not King Charles III)
Hello, newbie to editing here. Thanks, Annette (Amcarlson4)
In section: History: Personal union with Hungary (1102) and Habsburg Monarchy (1527)...
@
Amcarlson4 I think it's the ordinal in context - this Charles was likely the third king of Croatia named that way. Perhaps we could use a topical redirect to make this clearer. --
Joy (
talk) 18:22, 25 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Hi Joy,
Thanks for your reply. I "vote" to use the "Emperor Charles VI" as the text of the link to the wikipedia page titled "Charles VI, Holy Roman Emperor"
Here's my reasoning:
1) This paragraph is about the Pragmatic Sanction... this was signed by Emperor Charles VI in 1712.
2) "Charles VI" was Holy Roman Emperor and ruler of the Austrian Habsburg monarchy from 1711 until his death in 1740. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_VI,_Holy_Roman_Emperor
3) There is mention (in the Charles_VI wiki page) of a King of Spain as Charles III in 1759. -- this is a different person, who has a different wikipedia page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_III_of_Spain
4) There was a King of Bohemia, Charles III (Karel III.) 1916–1918 Grandnephew of Francis Joseph I. Also Emperor of Austria and King of Hungary. -- This is also a different person. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_I_of_Austria
5) Using "Charles III" here will confuse the reader, because the current King of England, Charles III (2022 – present) is very well known to the public and he has been in the media ever since his birth in 1948 to Queen Elizabeth II. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_III.
Amcarlson4 (
talk) 23:55, 25 March 2024 (UTC)reply
In relation to a description of a long past event of Croatian history, it's perfectly reasonable to use the nomenclature relevant in that context, but link to the precise person to help the reader understand who specifically is talked about. If we compare what e.g. the Croatian Encyclopedia does, their article about the monarch is at
https://www.enciklopedija.hr/clanak/karlo-vi and they clearly use both Karlo VI. and Karlo III.. Ambiguity is a simple fact of life, and it can definitely lead to confusion, but there's no mention of the British or Bohemian monarchs in this context, and the link is correct, so it's hard to see where the confusion would arise. Likewise, changing the text to say "
Charles VI" would also be visibly ambiguous with all the other monarchs refered to that way, so I'm not sure I see a big difference even if we went through with that change. --
Joy (
talk) 15:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC)reply