Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague ( talk · contribs) 18:10, 8 January 2013 (UTC) I will perform this review. QatarStarsLeague ( talk) 18:10, 8 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Excellent, and very informative. Set the tone for a great article.

This structure provides clarity to what would have ostensibly been an otherwise ambiguous section.

A great section, detailing the ground-laying of a financial institution. Great job.

"In 2006 Credit Suisse acknowledged misconduct for helping Iran and other countries hide transactions from US authorities and paid a $536 million settlement." Comma after 2006 and, also, is there a specific case article on Wikipedia regarding the misconduct?
All else is good.

•  Done No article dedicated to the controversy CorporateM ( Talk) 19:39, 19 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Did any of the indicted employees receive sentences, or just corporate fines?
Everything else is fine.  Done

I will get to this later. Excellent so far. QatarStarsLeague ( talk) 06:28, 18 January 2013 (UTC) reply
The diagram on the right edge of the page is a helpful touch, and the content in very informative. A certain pass here.

"Credit Suisse has been recognized by the Asset Triple A Awards." Besides needing a reference for this line, everything is great.  Done

A nice touch.

All in all, this is a very informative article, and I feel that upon the above proposed changes being made, I can and will pass this article. Congratulations! QatarStarsLeague ( talk) 17:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC) reply

All done. Thanks so much! CorporateM ( Talk) 23:01, 24 January 2013 (UTC) reply