This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
So this section...
...is marked with one citation needed for Peter David saying his creator-owned works have sold a small fraction, which is all well and good. but the initial statement doesn't follow from that. Creators tend to get a larger percentage take from books they own, which contrasts publisher-owned books where the writer or artist might get an up-front fee and nothing else. Considering there is no citation for the comment and no proof that there is a monetary disadvantage, I'm just going to remove that little paragraph. Feel free to put it back in if there are some statistics beyond the comments of one writer to back it up. -- 98.154.170.255 ( talk) 23:38, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
The article speaks almost solely of US-situation, portraying it as standard worldwide, with Britain as the sole exclusion. This gives very wrong impression of the situation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.240.52.235 ( talk) 15:25, 23 August 2015 (UTC)