This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Houston, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.HoustonWikipedia:WikiProject HoustonTemplate:WikiProject HoustonHouston articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Not very likely he was using
this. It's most probably .30-06 (though
.30-30 is a very common chambering for hunting rifles too).
Looks like the error is present from the
original version of the page, and the citation that supposedly supports the ".36 caliber hunting rifle" does not mention it. I suggest we remove it.
Parsecboy (
talk)
17:48, 9 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Executions in Texas are generally scheduled to begin about 6:00 PM. There are last-minute reprieves from the governor or the federal legal system, but if such happened one would expect to see a sudden article about it... ?
WhisperToMe (
talk)
01:53, 10 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Still frustrating at the amount/lack of research regarding this article. Widespread claim of 5 is unsubstantiated. Even conviction doesn't add up. Original police reports were misinterpreted. Is the reluctance to accept that he killed 4 people due to the amount of media misinformation? There is only the total to be corrected. The significance of 4 vs. 5 dead seems clear to me. How can this be corrected?
Joebrown1958 (
talk)
14:12, 10 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The court document above states two things of interest. (1) The last male victim, Kelly Hazlip, was shot in the abdomen from a distance of about two feet. Hazlip survived for five days before dying. Maybe that's the discrepancy? He "survived" the initial shooting, but died five days later. (2) Appellant [Wesbrook], the only surviving witness to the shooting, testified on his own behalf to explain the sequence of events that night. I believe there were five victims. Why does anyone think only four? Thanks.
Joseph A. Spadaro (
talk)
18:07, 10 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Diana Money was not killed. In fact she testified at Coy Wesbrook's trial. I don't have time or money to order trial transcripts and death certificates for you. She died 2 years after Wesprook's conviction and he was never charged with her murder. —
Joebrown1958 (
talk)
01:34, 20 April 2016 (UTC) [Originally posted at
User talk:Joebrown1958.]reply
The
news report gives the name of the other female victim as Diana Money. But the court report mentioned above and the
report of a later appeal both call her Ruth Money (and both reports are quite clear in citing five victims). I have added two sources that give the full name as Diana Ruth Money. I am inclined to dismiss the
offender information as erroneous.
Joebrown, if your claim was true, you would not need to order trial transcripts and death certificates - there would be ample other evidence on the web. I repeat, you are just wasting our time. —
RHaworth (
talk·contribs)
20:00, 21 April 2016 (UTC)reply