This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is
related to the Archives of American Art. Learn more about this collaborative project about documenting the history of American art
here.Archives of American ArtWikipedia:GLAM/Archives of American ArtTemplate:WikiProject Archives of American ArtArchives of American Art-related articles
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the
importance scale.
Untitled
I've been trying to figure out how to link this up into the rest of the wikipedia. Right now it only links from the discussion page of
Cowboy.
Considering the Cowboy Artists of America have their own museum, have had several books written about them, as well as at least one book/monograph per artist, and the fact that they are collected by many very serious collectors, they should fit into the scheme of things around here.
To be honest, Wikipedia is still very biased and imbalanced with regard to its content...
Yeah, that's right. I created this page. And pretty much wrote it. I created the page on
Ruffian (racehorse). And pretty much wrote it. I've added to the
Secretariat (racehorse) page - and more than a trivial correction.
I've added to the List of Historical Horses page. And the Western Movies article.
And I've done other stuff.
Just because I didn't sign my name doesn't make my observation not legitimate.
In fact, this comment isn't signed as well. Again, it's the content of the observation that counts.
And because I made the observation and wrote it, you (RickK) came and read it. But instead of helping out yourself, all you did was make an even less constructive observation - ah, but you signed your name, so we know who you are.