![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I think Coring and Core sample would go quite well together. Does anyone have any reason the two shouldn't be merged? TastyCakes ( talk) 23:22, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Since I'm sitting on a mobile offshore drilling rig, reading the proposal for coring on the next well, I suppose I'd better go through this article and address multiple issues I see on first read-through. The notes below are as much for my own guidance while modifying the article.
I'll make some alterations in respect of these issues and see what other people have to say.
Aidan Karley ( talk) 14:06, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
The history of core sampling in this article gives no dates and does not tell who did the first core sampling. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.149.207.218 ( talk) 12:11, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Please review this caption for correctness.
The core in the picture does not appear to be granitic. Is it a gneiss?
To me, it looks more like a gabbro or a norite.
What do you think?
Thank you for your time,
08Geologist80 21:54, 14 October 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 08Geologist80 ( talk • contribs)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Core sample. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:23, 13 August 2017 (UTC)