From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The "Theories" section seems to mostly be written in support of this publication: https://peerj.com/articles/7096/ —Is the Wikipedia article biased or being used to strengthen the publication linked? ( rcbarnes, 21:13, 11 April 2022 (UTC) ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rcbarnes ( talkcontribs)

Surely, this should not be the impression. Indeed, there is very little scientific literature on theories, given that the contralateral organization of the brain is such a well-known phenomenon. Possibly the opening paragraph of the "Theories" section should be made less concise (i.e. listing earlier proposals more explicitly) and the reference to https://peerj.com/articles/7096/ removed (it is cited again later). Is that what you mean? Marci68 ( talk) 06:27, 14 April 2022 (UTC) reply
Many thanks for the comment: I now revised the introduction to the Contralateral brain#Theories section! Marci68 ( talk) 20:06, 15 April 2022 (UTC) reply