![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Although informative, the article does not feel neutral, but slanted in favor of the subject. That's why I've added the POV template. I hope someone who has more knowledge about this subject than me can edit it to feel more in accordance with NPOV. Entheta ( talk) 19:38, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
I hope I am doing this right. A colleague of mine posted information on Confidence-Based Learning and how the methodology is being used to change some traditional approaches to training. I will review the NPOV criteria and edit the document accordingly. The intent was more about the work of James Bruno and how the confidence-based learning methodology was developed. It was not meant to be slanted but more informative about the use of a confidence metric and a correctness metric to determine gaps in knowledge. Dr. Bruno had developed an approach where in a single response to a question, the two metrics are generated simultaneously. Since I have spend several years working on this process, I will edit the document accordingly. Thank you for pointing this out. Masterychef ( talk) 22:19, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
I am using CBL for the last four months and do not find any discrepancy between my experience on CBL and what the article says. The article correctly reflects the research and it's outcome. However, since I have commercial interest in CBL, I too may be biased. -- Kksengupta ( talk) 05:17, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 00:54, 22 June 2013 (UTC)