This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to
comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the
current tasks, visit the
notice board,
the attached article or discuss it at the
project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Is it necessary for all Marvel RPG supplements to have a separate article for each of them? I do not believe that each entry on
List of Marvel RPG supplements is notable enough to warrant a separate article. The information in these stub articles should instead be merged into the list. Thoughts?
Fortdj33 (
talk)
16:40, 22 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Several of them have multiple independent reviews noted on them, so I think at least those should be retained. I have verified per RPGNet and RPGGeek that these reviews are valid.
65.126.152.254 (
talk)
13:22, 23 October 2015 (UTC)reply
How about making two lists? One list being a table (like it is now with basic info) and one extended list with separate chapters that detail every campaign/supplemental. Either both lists in two different articles or even both in one article, maybe only giving very prominent supplementals then its own article (like for example the
Gamer's Handbook). --
Weapon X(
talk,
contribs)00:52, 27 January 2016 (UTC)reply