Does anyone have any information on Boniface Atticus I? I can't find anything online. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.48.16.43 ( talk) 01:43, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
Shouldn't the article say "Conclavist popes" rather than "Conclavist Antipopes"? Does this depend on point of view or are these considered antipopes within conclavism? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.243.105.199 ( talk) 19:11, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
The information that Mirko Krav Fabris is the first conclavist antipope was
added in 2008 without giving any source.
I have not found anything on this supposed antipope from Croatia apart from a reference from Chryssides (see below). The
information on the standup.si website of "MIRKO FABRIS KRAV" does not match with someone who is born before 1978.
George Chryssides gives in his Historical Dictionary of New Religious Movements (2nd ed. from 2012) the name "Mirko Krav Fabis" (not "Fabris", but the book also has in the same entry "Joaquia Sánez y Arriga" which is a typo mistake for
Joaquín Sáenz y Arriaga so maybe "Fabis" is also a typo) as the first Conclavist antipope. However, I am afraid it may be a case of
WP:CITOGENESIS. The first edition of the book
is from 2001, but I am unable to consult it, so I cannot know for sure whether we are facing a citogenesis incident or not [EDIT: and after consulting the first edition
on the Internet Archive, I see there is no "Conclavism" or "Conclavist" entry where they should be (p. 96-7), and after a digital OCR search inside the book I see there is no mention of "conclav", "Krav", "Fabris" or "Fabis"].
The only way I found to potentially enter in contact with Chryssides is by using the e-mail adress given on
this website (there is no way to contact Chryssides throught his personnal website); so far, I have not attempted to make contact. I will ask for advice from other Wikipedia users.
Veverve (
talk)
23:47, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sedevacantist Antipope and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 7#Sedevacantist Antipope until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve ( talk) 00:46, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sedevacantist antipope and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 7#Sedevacantist antipope until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve ( talk) 21:48, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sedevacantist antipopes and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 7#Sedevacantist antipopes until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve ( talk) 21:48, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sedevacantist Antipopes and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 7#Sedevacantist Antipopes until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve ( talk) 21:48, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Gregory XIX and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 7#Gregory XIX until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve ( talk) 21:51, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Pope Gregory XIX and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 7#Pope Gregory XIX until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve ( talk) 21:51, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Why doesn't the page mention the Palmarian popes who are perhaps the most prominent conclavists? Their difference to other conclavists is that they recognize Pope Paul VI too while other conclavists consider Pius XII or John XXIII the last "legitimate Popes" of Rome, but the Palmarian Church shares the same opposition to the 2nd Vatican Council. 2001:4BC9:A44:401F:AC4A:9653:195D:E222 ( talk) 12:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)