The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Divon lan ( talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted on 9 March 2012 by reviewer Hallows AG ( talk · contribs).

The technical term "re-sequencing" is so specialized that, not only is it defined nowhere in Wikipedia, there are only 3 occurrences of the term in the article on DNA Sequencing -- only one of which uses the hyphenated form. Indeed, it makes little sense to include the qualifier at all since "genomic data" necessarily implies base pair positions. Jim Bowery ( talk) 15:31, 20 October 2017 (UTC) reply

I agree, and I’ve taken the liberty of moving the page since nobody has objected in the ~1.5 years since your comment.-- klmr ( talk) 14:27, 30 January 2019 (UTC) reply

Shouldn't the title have sentence casing?

-- Mortense ( talk) 00:38, 14 February 2020 (UTC) reply

The editor that added the genozip section has previously disclosed a COI on other articles featuring this tool, but failed to do that here. Also the compression percentage of up to 99% for bam and fastq files is not found in the provided reference, so it strongly seems like self promotion, especially since the tool is commercial. 130.226.236.6 ( talk) 12:31, 19 September 2022 (UTC) reply