This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
I have proposed Open source project management software be merged here. As things stand, it is a fork of this article, and serves no purpose since the license column in this article can be easily sorted. More worryingly, each article's content seems to have been updated separately. Lmatt ( talk) 02:45, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
{{request edit}}
The General Information section should be updated to say that Project KickStart is hosted on-premise and it is not SaaS. The Features section has incorrect information on Project KickStart; it does feature a workflow system, document management, and reporting and analyses.
Webplanner has been on the market since August 2, 2011, and would be a good addition to this chart. General Information for Webplanner: Web-based, not hosted on-premise, SaaS, proprietary. Webplanner Features: Collaborative, scheduling, resource management, workflow system, document management. "No" for the others.
Independent sites that mention Webplanner:
San Francisco Chronicle
Makeuseof
Killerstartups
Smashingapps
PM4Girls
The PMO Podcast
Women 2.0
Reorg.co
Disclosure: I work for Experience in Software, makers of
Project KickStart and Webplanner. Given the potential conflict of interest, I am following the advice here:
WP:SCOIC
Webplanner ( talk) 23:44, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add software Project Monitor to the list. Characteristics : General Information Software web-based Hosted on premise SaaS License Project Monitor yes yes yes Proprietary
Features Software Collaborative Issue tracking Scheduling PPM Resource Mgmt Document Mgmt Workflow Reporting Project Monitor yes yes yes yes yes yes yes yes
Project Monitor is used by 70 companies, including Orange, JC Decaux, Cartier... As an independent consultant I have personally been involved in the implementation of Project monitor for some of these companies.
Tbocock ( talk) 07:54, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Add software O HUB to the list. Characteristics : General Information
Software web-based Hosted on premise SaaS License O HUB yes yes yes Open source
Features Software - O HUB Issue tracking system - No Scheduling - Yes Project portfolio management - Yes Resource management - Yes Document management system - Yes Workflow - No Reporting - Yes
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Grachiov ( talk • contribs) 18:02, 1 May 2012
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change trac "hosted on-premise" to Yes. It is downloadable from here Jezmpez ( talk) 14:13, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Can we add 2-plan project management software in this article? I have downloaded this software for free and am using it. Not sure if that can be considered a conflict of interest. PolicarpioM ( talk) 06:18, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I think we should add the software project team builder. I used it and I noticed: It is web based, not sure about hosted on premises, available as SAAS, has a propriety license, is collaborative, does not offer issue tracking, deals with scheduling, deals with PPM, deals with resource management, I think it does not deal with document management, has a workflow system and reporting analysis. I'll look for sources for this information when I have more time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.108.41.21 ( talk) 12:35, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change 'Oracle Project Portfolio Management' to 'Oracle Primavera EPPM' because this is the correct name currently, following Oracle's acquisition on Primavera Systems, Inc. Please link this internally to the page 'Primavera (systems)', again, because this is now a more accurate page to reflect Oracle's PPM software.
For the same reason, please could 'Primavera Planner Suite' be removed altogether as it no longer exists.
Source: http://blogs.forrester.com/application_development/2008/10/oracle-acquires.html
CapilanoSabores ( talk) 16:25, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Could the Oracle Primavera EPPM listing be linked to the internal page Primavera (software) as this page is more directly related to the subject and so more informative CapilanoSabores ( talk) 15:42, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
Open source project which appears to get only 24 search results on Google, but probably deserves a place be in the comparison tables Larytet ( talk) 01:38, 1 August 2012 (UTC)