This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Technology This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met Associated task forces: /  Military science, technology, and theory task force

I see that it has been suggested that Combat endurance should be merged with Military training. No reason is given, and I fail to see any. What is the relationship between, say, the time a submarine can be on patrol before exhausting its torpedoes, supplies, etc., and training? Pol098 ( talk) 13:27, 29 March 2010 (UTC) reply

My reaction is similar, I don't think that Military training is the correct place for this. -- Petteri Aimonen ( talk) 10:44, 20 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Obviously it has multiple issues - stubs always do, they're just a starting point. It's a single-sentence stub for the moment. Needs adding to. Pol098 ( talk) 00:49, 1 August 2010 (UTC) reply