This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer graphics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
computer graphics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer graphicsWikipedia:WikiProject Computer graphicsTemplate:WikiProject Computer graphicscomputer graphics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
computers,
computing, and
information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article has been
automatically rated by a
bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a
stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
Why it shouldn't be deleted. It is essential, and I can rephrase the content so it is not copyright infrigement, ASAP, but no sooner than I find additional reference material. Thanks. --
Mtodorov 6911:12, 9 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Done this. Goodness you are quick!
I hope it is not copyright infrigement now. I am deeply apologizing, I thought quoting single sentence with valid reference not only trivial, but legal also. --
Mtodorov 6911:21, 9 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Good job. I wonder though if this isn't just another name for
radiosity, or at least a sub-phenomenon of radiosity. Would this be worth merging into the radiosity article? ~
MatticusTC11:26, 9 May 2007 (UTC)reply
Goodness, no! Term
color bleeding is also used in graphic industry, print and in textile industry, as the ref you erased said. I am searching diligently for refs, pls don't rush erasing them.
Hm, it would seem that the same term is used in two different fields to refer to very different things. The refs given in the article refer only to its use in the realm of computer graphics, whereas the ref you give above is for its use in printing. In this case, I think it would be wise to have two separate articles for the term - one describing its use in computer graphics, the other its use in printing (whether the computer graphics one is worth merging to
radiosity] is another debate). This is why Wikipedia has
disambiguation pages. I will move the current article to
color bleeding (computer graphics), make a new article under
color bleeding (printing), and turn
color bleeding into a disambiguation page. This helps separate out the two usages of the term. ~
MatticusTC11:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)reply